Isaac Was Abraham's Only Child; Ishmael Was Not His Biological Child, According To Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes May 2026

: He argues that Ishmael was born to Abram , whereas Isaac was born to Abraham . Since God changed Abram's name to Abraham specifically for the covenant of promise, Suleman asserts that Ishmael belongs to the "old" identity and Isaac to the "new".

: Ishmael was born when Abraham (then Abram) was 86; Isaac was born 14 years later when he was 100. : He argues that Ishmael was born to

: In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity. : In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually

: Suleman points to Genesis 22:2 , where God tells Abraham, "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac". He argues that if Ishmael were recognized as Abraham’s son by God, this phrasing would be inaccurate. : The teaching aligns with the broader theological

: The teaching aligns with the broader theological view that Ishmael was a "son of the flesh" (born of human effort through Hagar), while Isaac was the "son of the promise" (born through divine intervention). Broader Biblical Context

Welcome to the Customer Help Centre

For information relating to the use of products and services provided by Telappliant

    Sorry, we didn't find any relevant articles for you.

    Send us your queries using the form below and we will get back to you with a solution.


    : He argues that Ishmael was born to Abram , whereas Isaac was born to Abraham . Since God changed Abram's name to Abraham specifically for the covenant of promise, Suleman asserts that Ishmael belongs to the "old" identity and Isaac to the "new".

    : Ishmael was born when Abraham (then Abram) was 86; Isaac was born 14 years later when he was 100.

    : In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity.

    : Suleman points to Genesis 22:2 , where God tells Abraham, "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac". He argues that if Ishmael were recognized as Abraham’s son by God, this phrasing would be inaccurate.

    : The teaching aligns with the broader theological view that Ishmael was a "son of the flesh" (born of human effort through Hagar), while Isaac was the "son of the promise" (born through divine intervention). Broader Biblical Context

    Still can't find what you are looking for?

    Isaac was Abraham's only child; Ishmael was not his biological child, according to Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes

    Our award-winning customer care team is here for you.

    Contact Support

    Powered by Isaac was Abraham's only child; Ishmael was not his biological child, according to Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes