The story’s strength lies in its protagonist, Standish Treadwell. Labeled as "stupid" by the state because of his dyslexia and unique way of seeing the world, Standish actually possesses a clarity that his peers lack. While the citizens of the Motherland are fed lies about a glorious space race and a moon landing, Standish sees the peeling paint, the hunger, and the disappearances of those who dissent. His perspective serves as a literary device to illustrate that those who do not fit the "perfect" mold of a regime are often the ones best equipped to recognize its inherent flaws.
The "Worm Moon" of the title refers to a faked lunar landing, a grand deception designed to prove the Motherland’s superiority. Gardner uses this central lie to critique how authoritarian regimes use spectacle to distract from domestic suffering. The moon, traditionally a symbol of mystery and beauty, is revealed to be "worm-eaten"—corrupt and hollow—much like the society Standish inhabits. By exposing this lie, Standish doesn't just debunk a scientific claim; he dismantles the myth of the state’s invincibility.
Friendship acts as the catalyst for rebellion in the novel. The bond between Standish and his friend Hector provides a rare glimpse of warmth in a cold, gray world. When Hector and his family are taken away by the authorities, Standish’s quest to find them transforms from a personal mission into a strike against the heart of the government’s propaganda machine. This shift highlights a central theme: individual acts of love and loyalty are the ultimate threats to systems built on fear and isolation.
Ultimately, Worm Moon is a chilling reminder of the fragility of freedom. It warns that when a society prizes order over humanity and truth, it sacrifices its soul. Standish Treadwell stands as a symbol for every individual who refuses to look away from uncomfortable truths. His journey proves that even in a world stripped of color and hope, the courage to imagine a "Zone of the Moon" where one can be free is the first step toward reclaiming reality from the hands of tyrants.
In 2018, we (LLC and MP) met in person for the first time in the lobby outside a large conference room at the United Nations Office in Vienna. Although we had collaborated previously (Palit & Levin, 2016; Charlés & Samarasinghe, 2016), we had never met face-to-face. In Vienna, we were invited participants in a United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) technical consultation: “Elements of Family-based Treatments for Adolescents with Drug Use Disorders: Creating Societies Resilient to Drugs and Crime.” This consultation meeting included 25 experts across the fields of family therapy, staff from the UNODC PTRS unit, and the World Health Organization, and subject matter experts in substance use disorders and countering violent extremism. The meeting was convened for a memorable week in Vienna, with participants from over 13 countries. The goal of the meeting was “to identify key elements of effective approaches to the treatment of adolescents with drug use disorders and to provide guidance for the development of a UN training package on family therapy.” A key aspect of the “effective approaches” and “guidance” asked of us as a group of technical experts was that we had to consider FT adaptation and implementation in low and middle income countries. The challenge is clear; while research studies in many contexts illustrate how systemic family therapy practices are part of the evidence base, Busse et al. (2021) noted that:
…almost all these studies were conducted in high-income countries and almost all of them were conducted within a research context in university setting. As such, the findings might not be generalisable to studies conducted in LMICs …. Furthermore, adolescents with SUDs and their families in LMICs do not have or very little access to effective treatment such as family-based therapy. To address this accessibility gap as well as to increase quality and diversity of treatment options for adolescents with drug and other SUDs, the Treatnet Family (TF) was developed by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC; 2020). (p. 2) skachat knigu chervivaia luna
That package that was begun in 2018 in Vienna is now called Treatnet Family (see below for an example of some of the concepts addressed in the package). Treatnet Family has been a part of feasibility studies, has been implemented in many countries and regions, and involved hundreds of practitioners across the globe. The package is openly accessible at no cost, and as of this writing, has been translated into four languages, with more on the way. We need more multilateral efforts and collaborations like this one, and family therapy as an established field needs to hear much more and much more often about the ways practice must be adapted to meet country contexts across the globe. The story’s strength lies in its protagonist, Standish
A recent publication by Busse et al. (2021) described Treatnet Family (TF) as: His perspective serves as a literary device to
containing elements of evidence-based family therapy which has been developed specifically for adolescents with SUDs and their families in low resource settings. TF focuses on family interactions and uses elements of family therapy to interrupt ineffective communication within the family. It contains the key components of family therapy, such as:
TF has six sessions, with each session lasting between 90 and 120 minutes. Each session is to be attended by the adolescent with SUDs and his/her family members because the primary focus of the sessions is on the relationships among family members. The practitioner’s role is to interrupt problematic cycles, ineffective communication, and harmful behaviors family members currently use to meet their emotional and interpersonal needs. As change in family interaction can influence each family member’s behavior, family members are encouraged to be part of the solution.” (p. 2)
For more on Treatnet Family: https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeasterneurope/UNODC_Treatnet_Family_brochure_190320.pdf
The following are definitions for terms commonly used pertaining to becoming licensed in other states or practicing in other states. The definitions below represent how these terms are used in this article and may not represent how these terms are defined by others:
Portability: Portability or license portability is the general ability to take an individual’s qualifications for a license in one state and apply them for licensure in another state. The term “portability” is used to describe the various methods to allow a licensee in one state to be able to legally provide services to clients in other states, including through model laws, reciprocity, endorsement, or compacts.
Model Laws: Model laws, also referred to as model portability laws, are laws included as provisions within existing state licensure statutes that allow out-of-state licensees to obtain a license in a state in an expedited fashion without having to meet all of the requirements that an associate clinician applying for initial licensure would have to meet. Most MFT state licensure laws contact such model laws allowing an MFT licensed in another state to obtain licensure if they meet certain requirements or have been licensed for several years. Model laws are far more common than licensure compacts. Unlike compacts, the language in model laws can differ from state to state.
Endorsement: Endorsement generally describes laws that allow a state board to recognize or endorse a person’s license granted in another state, allowing that person to become licensed in the endorsing state. The terms “portability” and “endorsement” are commonly used interchangeably.
Reciprocity: Licensure reciprocity is when a state honors and recognizes licensees from certain other states through mutual agreements in other states. However, in the healthcare field, these agreements, which must be approved by officials in each state, are not found in most states pertaining to mental health licensure as states are reluctant to grant reciprocity.
The story’s strength lies in its protagonist, Standish Treadwell. Labeled as "stupid" by the state because of his dyslexia and unique way of seeing the world, Standish actually possesses a clarity that his peers lack. While the citizens of the Motherland are fed lies about a glorious space race and a moon landing, Standish sees the peeling paint, the hunger, and the disappearances of those who dissent. His perspective serves as a literary device to illustrate that those who do not fit the "perfect" mold of a regime are often the ones best equipped to recognize its inherent flaws.
The "Worm Moon" of the title refers to a faked lunar landing, a grand deception designed to prove the Motherland’s superiority. Gardner uses this central lie to critique how authoritarian regimes use spectacle to distract from domestic suffering. The moon, traditionally a symbol of mystery and beauty, is revealed to be "worm-eaten"—corrupt and hollow—much like the society Standish inhabits. By exposing this lie, Standish doesn't just debunk a scientific claim; he dismantles the myth of the state’s invincibility.
Friendship acts as the catalyst for rebellion in the novel. The bond between Standish and his friend Hector provides a rare glimpse of warmth in a cold, gray world. When Hector and his family are taken away by the authorities, Standish’s quest to find them transforms from a personal mission into a strike against the heart of the government’s propaganda machine. This shift highlights a central theme: individual acts of love and loyalty are the ultimate threats to systems built on fear and isolation.
Ultimately, Worm Moon is a chilling reminder of the fragility of freedom. It warns that when a society prizes order over humanity and truth, it sacrifices its soul. Standish Treadwell stands as a symbol for every individual who refuses to look away from uncomfortable truths. His journey proves that even in a world stripped of color and hope, the courage to imagine a "Zone of the Moon" where one can be free is the first step toward reclaiming reality from the hands of tyrants.
I (LLC) interviewed Alexandra “Xan” Weber, International Institute for New England’s (IINE) Senior Vice President for Advancement. IINE was founded in 1918, and is a non-profit social service organization that serves refugees and immigrants through resettlement, education, livelihood/career advancement and support for the journey toward citizenship. Responsible for resource development, advocacy, and strategic initiatives, Xan oversees the organization’s fundraising, institutional partnerships, advocacy initiatives, and strategic planning. She began her career at IINE in 2008 as IINE’s Director of Community Services, managing the Boston site’s refugee resettlement program, various victim services projects, and behavioral health services. IINE is an affiliate of the United States Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, and one of the nine national networks contracted with the U.S. Department of State to resettle Afghan evacuees. In 12 weeks, IINE resettled over 450 Afghan evacuees throughout New England.
Laurie: What are the most important things that clinicians need to know about this group?
Xan: In my presentations to the community, I often list everything that refugees usually go through—statelessness and forced migration, violence, war. This population faced an additional challenge—evacuation, an additional trauma. At IINE, we’re not used to receiving evacuated populations who have had no time to prepare and process their resettlement. Afghan evacuees did not prepare for resettlement and I think that that in itself has created another layer of suffering. We are meeting many Afghans who do not have a sense of refugee identity. Evacuees made a life or death decision to evacuate—a lot to process in just a short amount of time. And we’ve heard the actual evacuation itself was horrible and traumatic. People rushing the airports and tarmacs and getting trampled, getting pulled over barbed wire fencing to reach an airplane, some people making it onboard and others not and families separated.
Afghan evacuees were air evac’ed from Afghanistan to a third country, and this step added to the complexity of their resettlement process. From overseas bases, evacuees were flown to Dulles Airport in Virginia and then dispersed to military bases in the U.S. A shuffling between U.S. bases in multiple countries is not the typical refugee experience, and when they arrived at U.S. bases, most lacked processing documentation. Lack of documentation impacted evacuees’ sense of